Audrey Tang is the Digital Minister of Taiwan who uses civic inclusion, open-source technology, transparency, and humour to fight disinformation in a pioneering way. The jury nominates Audrey Tang for her unwavering commitment to utilizing technology for the greater good, promoting digital literacy and empowering citizens to become more informed and engaged in the democratic process.

Kenny Dos Santos is the founder of MIK Biblioteket, a platform providing teachers with accessible and unique educational material to promote media and information literacy in Swedish schools. The jury nominates Kenny Dos Santos for his significant commitment to building resilience against disinformation and fake news among children and young people at an early age.

Jigsaw is a unit within Google that develops cutting-edge technology to address existing and emerging threats to open societies. The jury nominates Jigsaw and its CEO Yasmin Green for the creation and utilization of powerful digital tools to fight disinformation, censorship, toxic language, and violent extremism. By making the tools accessible to the public, they increase the collective capacity to fight severe societal challenges.

Abbie Richards is a researcher and content creator known for creating the widely popular interactive taxonomy chart "The Conspiracy Chart" and for fighting disinformation and conspiracy theories through social media. The jury nominates Abbie Richards for her outstanding ability to educate and engage a diverse audience using humor, facts, and accessible graphic design, as well as her ability to facilitate a deeper understanding of some of the most complex and pressing societal issues of today.

Bellingcat is an independent international collective of researchers, investigators and citizen journalists that employs open-source intelligence, social media, and other publicly available sources to investigate various types of conflicts and crises around the world. The jury nominates Bellingcat and its founder Eliot Higgins for their innovative methods, which have led to a new generation of investigative journalism and enabled Bellingcat to uncover critical information about urgent global issues.

​Nitsan Yasur is the co-founder of Fake Reporter, an organisation that fights disinformation through a crowdsourced reporting platform that, together with open-source information, provides real-time responses to current disinformation campaigns. The jury nominates Nitsan Yasur for developing the innovative reporting platform and for his investigations that have led to concrete changes in the Israeli political system.

Mastodon is a community-based social media platform, created as an alternative to established platforms which are based on algorithms for maximizing time spent and advertising revenue. The jury nominates Mastodon and its founder Eugen Rochko for establishing a more democratic platform that can foster a non-polarizing public discussion which is essential for creating a more sustainable future.

Sophia Smith Galer is an author and journalist who combats misinformation about sex and sexual health in traditional and social media. The jury nominates Sophia Smith Galer for her innovative awareness campaigns that have reached a broad audience on social media and her book, "Losing It: Sex education for the 21st century” which debunks sexual myths in an accessible and insightful format.

Centre for humane Technology is an NGO focused on combating the negative effects of technology on society and promoting humane technology for a more sustainable future. The jury nominates Center for Humane Technology and its Executive Director Tristan Harris, for the tireless efforts to fight disinformation and promote digital well-being to benefit individuals, society, and democracy

Kaylin Dodson is a researcher and writer who specializes in exploring the effects of mis- and disinformation on various subgroups. Through her work, she has specifically examined how COVID-19 disinformation has impacted the Black community. The jury nominates Kaylin Dodson for her insightful research that shows how disinformation disproportionately can affect different groups of people and the importance of taking these varying perspectives into account when examining the impacts of disinformation.